Skip to main content

Appendix H — Catalogue of qang sub-measures

The qang unit does not reformulate any physical law. Each sub-measure in this catalogue is a reading of one probability, or of a few, and equals a quantity that physics or statistics already has. What a sub-measure can bring is a decision: fewer shots, a shorter pulse, a compilation chosen before running, a reading that noise does not bias. For each one the catalogue records its definition, what it equals, which decision it improves and with what evidence, and classifies it with one of the statuses of Table H.1.

The tables are generated from the registry qang.measures with tools/make_apendice_h.py, the same source for both languages of the book. A new sub-measure enters the catalogue as unverified and changes status only with a test, preferably pre-registered (Chapter 28).

Table H.1: Statuses of the catalogue.
status meaning sub-measures
exact exact identity: it names or re-scales something; no gain is claimed 18
measured gain tested in simulation or analysis, with a measured gain over the usual practice 14
tested on hardware tested on a real device 3
mixed a gain in some regimes, none or a loss in others 7
no gain tested: equivalent to the usual practice 4
against tested: worse than the usual practice 2
unverified untested proposal: a candidate for a pre-registered experiment 3
not adopted proposal rejected as wrong or unsupported 1

H.1 Base readings

Table H.2: Base readings.
sub-measure definition equals decision it improves status evidence where
\(qg_Z\) \(2p_0-1=\langle\sigma_z\rangle=\cos\theta\) expectation value of \(\sigma_z\) working coordinate measured without inversion exact identity; holds for mixed states ch. 1, §7
m-qg \(m=1000\,qg_Z\) \(\langle\sigma_z\rangle\) times a thousand, linear in \(p_0\) budget gate error and shot noise on one scale tested on hardware IQM Garnet: 1.64 m-qg per \(X\), over-rotations of 16–55 m-qg hidden from the readout model; M2 failed ch. 1, §168
\(\theta\) \(\arccos qg_Z\) arcsine transformation of a proportion error bar \(1/\sqrt N\) equal over the whole circle exact exact binomial sums; asymptotic (fails at \(Np\approx2.5\)) ch. 1, §125
\(qg_S\) \(H(p_0)=H\big((1+qg_Z)/2\big)\) Shannon entropy of the outcome certify randomness together with the mean reading mixed alone it is fooled under T1; paired with the mean reading it is not chs. 1 and 26, §7, §51
qga \(1\ \text{turn}=1000\ \text{qga}\) an angle in another unit write gate angles without factors of \(\pi\) exact convenience; changes neither gradients nor plateaus ch. 1
\((qg_Z,s)\) \(s=\operatorname{sign}(qg_X)\) the sign of the angle’s sine cross a pole during an optimization measured gain H\(_2\): with \(qg_Z\) alone it stops at Hartree–Fock; with the sign it reaches the exact energy ch. 1, §65

H.2 Derived quantities

Table H.3: Derived quantities.
sub-measure definition equals decision it improves status evidence where
\(qg_\kappa\) \(1/[\ln2\,(1-qg_Z^2)]\) Fisher information about \(qg_Z\), in bits damp an optimizer’s step near the poles no gain removes the divergence of the gradient in \(q\), but it is descent on \(\theta\): 103 steps both (ch. 30); the JAX bench repeats it chs. 1, 23 and 30
\(qg_{SNR}\) \(\lvert qg_Z\rvert/\sqrt{1-qg_Z^2}\) signal-to-noise of one shot, \(\lvert\cot\theta\rvert\) shots to read a sign: \((z/qg_{SNR})^2\) exact 27 shots at 60° for 3σ; exact binomial: error < 1 % chs. 1 and 3
\(qg_L\) \(\lvert\theta-\theta'\rvert/2\) Bhattacharyya angle; Fubini–Study on a common meridian distance between states from two \(Z\) histograms exact with different azimuths it is only a lower bound chs. 1 and 3
\(qg_\tau\) \(\sqrt{1-r^2}=2\sqrt{\det\rho}\) lack of purity see a pulse’s area where the m-qg reading does not shift exact 0.277 for \(R_X(324^\circ)\) against 0.031 for \(R_X(-36^\circ)\); needs three bases chs. 1–3
\(\kappa_{qg}\) \(1000\,\lvert\cos\theta\rvert\) curvature of the reading with respect to the angle predict the shift from amplitude error, \(\tfrac12\theta^2\sigma^2\kappa_{qg}\) exact QuTiP: agrees to second order chs. 1 and 2, §160
qFi \(4\pi^2\cdot10^{-6}\ \text{qga}^{-2}\) Fisher information of the qang angle fixed angular resolution: \(159.15/\sqrt N\) qga exact not a flat manifold: the sphere has curvature 4 ch. 1
qHz \(\text{qga}/\text{s}\) angular frequency, \(2\pi/1000\) rad/s none so far exact unit with no use in the book ch. 1

H.3 States and registers

Table H.4: States and registers.
sub-measure definition equals decision it improves status evidence where
\(1-r^2\) \(4p_0(1-p_0)\) at definite weight local purity measure purity with one basis instead of three measured gain holds only with a definite Hamming weight ch. 5
\(\arccos(qg_Z/r)\) \(qg_Z/r\) Bloch polar angle of a mixed state direction of a noisy state mixed in favour with depolarizing noise; against with pure dephasing ch. 5, §45
\(qg_{XX},qg_{YY},qg_{ZZ}\) \(\langle\sigma_i\otimes\sigma_i\rangle\) Pauli correlators diagnose a Bell pair and predict teleportation without teleporting measured gain 3 settings instead of 9; 4–5 two-qubit gates instead of 10–11, maximum error 0.029 chs. 12 and 13
\(m_E\) \(\sqrt{1000^2-m_\perp^2}\) Eve’s information (Helstrom with purification) how many test rounds certifying bits needs exact the computation is standard; the reading makes it geometric ch. 18
\((1000-m_r)/2000\) \(m_r=1000\,r\) energy of the passive state know how much energy nobody can extract exact modest: the split is read at a glance ch. 19
syndrome \(qg_Z,qg_X\) ancilla readings the \(T_2/T_1\) rule choose and recalibrate an error-correcting code without test shots measured gain 6.4 % over the oracle against 64–220 % for a fixed code; drift 13.1 % against 20.4 % ch. 26
\(\gamma\) \(1+2\sqrt{1-qg^2}\) overhead of cutting a gate choose which gates to cut mixed up to 2.9 times against angle-blind rules; none against qiskit-addon-cutting ch. 26
\(qg_Z\) on graph states \(qg_Z=0,\ qg_S=1\) the local \(Z\) reading detect entanglement with local \(Z\) readings no gain cannot tell a graph state from a product: the limit belongs to the \(Z\) basis ch. 30
parity \(qg\) \((dqg)^2/(1-qg^2)=N^2\) quantum Fisher information of a GHZ state reach the Heisenberg bound with a parity reading exact the one-shot formula of Chapter 1 reaches the bound ch. 34

H.4 Gates and compilation

Table H.5: Gates and compilation.
sub-measure definition equals decision it improves status evidence where
minimum area \(\theta\bmod2\pi\); \(R_{ZZ}\) with period \(\pi\) shortest representative of the same gate compile with less pulse area: less error measured gain 4-qubit QAOA: area 4.4× and error 4.1× lower; the 1.5× prediction for \(R_{ZZ}\) failed (1.14×) ch. 2, §160
exposure population outside the sector after each two-qubit gate noiseless computation on the circuit choose the compilation before spending shots measured gain rank correlation 0.80 with T1 leakage; zero exposure removes ≥ 98 % of T1 ch. 2, §68
\(N\)-conserving gates \([U,\sum_i Z_i]=0\) compilation within the sector compile so that the filter removes T1 mixed the filter removes 99.5 % of T1 against 48.5 % with CNOT; none on ions ch. 24, §61
qg grid equal steps in \(qg_Z\) control quantization quantize the control angles mixed probabilities \(\pi/2\) times better, 43 of 45 loads; against for fidelity near the poles ch. 27
best_chain qubit chain of highest predicted \(K\) layout choice from calibration data choose the physical qubits before running measured gain 6 to 17 points more shots kept than the default layout (simulated) ch. 32

H.5 Noise and readout

Table H.6: Noise and readout.
sub-measure definition equals decision it improves status evidence where
weight filter, \(K\) \(K=(1-\gamma)^{kd}\) post-selection on the Hamming sector read, train and differentiate under T1 without bias; shot cost known before running tested on hardware IQM Resonance: error 0.0615 → 0.0386 (1.59×) with 88 % of the shots; simulated: exact to \(10^{-12}\) m-qg; against with \(K\le0.14\) (2 of 12) and on deep LiH (76.6 → 85.0 mHa) chs. 20, 21, 23, 30 and 31, §112
echo, \(M^{1/2}\) echo transfer matrix correction of errors within the sector remove what the filter cannot see measured gain −27 to −62 % of the filtered error, with \(\binom nk\) more echo circuits ch. 22, §106
\(qg_{eq}\), \(T_\text{eff}\) heralded affine readout readout calibration with repeated measurements calibrate readout without mistaking temperature for error measured gain effective temperature to 1 mK; avoids an unsafe certifier and recovers 10–50 % of bits chs. 18 and 27, §31
step \(\times\lvert\sin\theta\rvert\) \(\theta-\eta\max(\lvert\sin\theta\rvert,\epsilon)\,g\) trust region near the poles train with aggressive rates without tuning measured gain 2.3 to 13 times more successes from rate 2; little or nothing with safe rates ch. 23
local cost \((1-\overline{qg_Z})/2\) local cost of Cerezo et al. avoid the barren plateau of a global cost mixed 470 times more gradient variance with 10 qubits and short circuits; none with deep circuits ch. 23
ZNE of the filtered reading zero-noise extrapolation on the filtered \(qg_Z\) post-selection and ZNE separately (mitiq) mitigate T1 and dephasing together measured gain 55.9 → 1.1 m-qg with T1 and dephasing; with few shots ZNE does not pay chs. 21 and 35
pair \((qg_S,\overline{qg_Z})\) entropy and mean reading of the register XEB or HOP with an ideal simulation tell T1 from unital noise from counts alone mixed 0.88–0.91 against 0.70–0.76 with strong noise; chance with realistic noise chs. 27, 29 and 30

H.6 Readings of known physical laws

Table H.7: Readings of known physical laws.
sub-measure definition equals decision it improves status evidence where
\(\langle\beta\rangle\) \(mc^2/E\) expectation value of the Dirac matrix \(\beta\) read \(E=mc^2\) and charge conjugation as a \(qg_Z\) tested on hardware exact and known; charge conjugation flips the reading; run §170 on IQM Garnet app. G, §170
\(\widehat{qg^2}\) unbiased squares standard bias correction compare two clocks with few shots measured gain bias from +11.8 % to +0.9 % with 100 shots ch. 8
unbiased \(\sqrt{S_1^2+S_2^2+S_3^2}\) unbiased Stokes squares degree of polarization estimate polarization with few photons measured gain the bias drops about three times, without vanishing ch. 6
\(\arccos(m/l)\) \(\langle J_z\rangle/l\) direction of \(\langle\mathbf J\rangle\) read angular momentum as a \(qg_Z\) exact the vector model \(\arccos(m/\sqrt{l(l+1)})\) draws something else ch. 11
flavour \(qg_Z\) \(1-2P_{\alpha\to\beta}\) oscillation probability read the mixing angle with a fixed error bar exact identity on the two-flavour formula ch. 9
\(m_Z\), \(m_X\) readings of the chronology qubit comparing density matrices tell P-CTC from D-CTC with one \(Z\) reading measured gain P-CTC moves \(m_Z\), D-CTC does not ch. 14
\((1000+m_P)(1000+m_F)\) \(=10^6\) Yoshida–Kitaev law judge a wormhole decoder exact the law is known; the scale shows that \(m_P=-500\) proves nothing ch. 15
\(N/2+\sum_n qg_n/2\) \(G/G_0=\sum_n T_n\) Landauer formula read conductance and partition noise on one scale exact conductance = mean \(qg\), noise = mean \(qg^2\); the bar of \(\hat\theta\) is constant (0.985–1.009) ch. 33
line in artanh \(\operatorname{artanh}qg\) Fermi fit measure electron temperature against bias of +2.9 % (Fermi fit: −0.14 %) ch. 33
\(\theta/2=\operatorname{gd}(r)\) Gudermannian of the squeezing \(r\) \(\tanh^2r\), \(\bar n\) and the entropy read squeezing as a qang angle exact a new identity, exact ch. 34
\(\theta=2\pi\Phi/\Phi_0\) interference fringes Aharonov–Bohm phase estimate the flux with an even error bar exact deviation \(1/2\pi\sqrt N\) constant; the sign needs another reading ch. 34

H.7 Open and rejected proposals

Table H.8: Open and rejected proposals.
sub-measure definition equals decision it improves status evidence where
\(\kappa_{qg}\) compilation minimum arrival curvature — mitigate barren plateaus unverified untested chs. 1 and 2
\(E_\text{total}\) \(\langle H\rangle+\lambda_\theta L(\theta)+\lambda_\varphi L(\varphi)\) — regularize a VQE unverified \(L\) and \(\lambda\) undefined ch. 1
\(R(\theta,\varphi)\) \(N[p_1+\alpha\cos\varphi]\) — model emission from the excited population unverified \(N\) and \(\alpha\) not fixed; not compared with an emission model ch. 1
500 qga CPT \(E_-\leftrightarrow\) a 500 qga shift — place antimatter on the scale not adopted no support; the correct reading is charge conjugation on \(\langle\beta\rangle\) ch. 1, app. G
signs of \(qg_{Z,i}\) \(\operatorname{sign}qg_{Z,i}\) bit-string histogram read the marked item in a noisy search against 66 % against 91 % for the histogram mode (5 qubits, 100 shots) ch. 3, §63
stopping \(qg_{SNR}\), \(qg_\kappa\) threshold on \(\lvert qg_k\rvert\) the formula for \(k^\ast\) stop Grover iterations no gain they cannot tell whether the flag passed the pole; they cost one run per \(k\) ch. 3
qg cycles angle-to-reading translation in Wigner, Kitaev and OTOC — protect states or measure chaos no gain they neither protect nor measure chaos ch. 34

H.8 Balance

Of 52 sub-measures, 18 are exact identities, 14 have a measured gain in simulation or analysis, 3 were tested on a real device (with a mixed result for the milli-qang), 7 are mixed, 4 turned out equivalent to the usual practice, 2 lost to it, 3 are unverified and 1 was not adopted. The gains do not come from the unit but from the decisions the reading allows before spending resources: choosing the minimum-area representative, the compilation of least exposure, the code from two readings, or reading only the weight sector that T1 does not contaminate. The unverified sub-measures are the list of pending experiments; the catalogue keeps them in sight so that they are not cited as results.

H.9 In code

from qang import measures

measures.summary()                       # sub-measures per status
measures.by_status("sin_verificar")      # the pending experiments
m = measures.find("min_area")
m.decision[1], m.evidence[1]             # the decision it improves and the evidence, in English
measures.resolve(m)                      # qang.pulse_area.minimal_area_circuit